Sunday, October 17, 2021

Carpe Jugulum by Sir Terry Pratchett, a guest review by Gary T. Stevens.

 Carpe Jugulum

By Sir Terry Pratchett 

Hello, fellow review readers.  At the invitation of our illustrious retired Teufelhund reviewer, I'm here adding my own little addition to this year's Fangsgiving.  As for introductions, for now we'll go with my chosen nomme de plume, Gary T. Stevens.  I have been mentioned before as the primary author of the Breach of Faith novels, of which three have been reviewed on this blog.  If you're already wondering about my sporadic, arguably pretentious, use of fancy non-English terms, it's part of my style and feeds my vanity (Vanity is counter-revolutionary, especially French language vanity.  You must be purged by the Khmer Rouge.[I'd be careful invoking that lot, given their attitudes towards people with academic learning :-P] If I were in Revolutionary Kampuchea, my doctorate would be the least of my concerns.[Touchè]), but I will try to dispense with it for the rest of this review.  I also ask for your patience; it has been many a year since I wrote something in this vein, so I won't be as concise and insightful as Garvin would be.

I admit I almost turned this down because I'm not much of a classical horror fan.  By volume my primary experience with vampires tends to be as enemies in video games to hit with whips (those kinky Belmonts[Don’t kink-shame the thirst-trap.][Do I want to know?  Actually, having finally finished Castlevania on Netflix over the last week, I think I do know.  Someone's a Trevor fan.]) or cast Fire and Cure spells on in Final Fantasy games, or alternatively, the various vampire courts of Jim Butcher's "Dresden Files" novels and comics.  But after some consideration I realized there was a novel I could cover that heavily features vampires (or vampyres in this case), and which I hadn't read in a while.  That book is Carpe Jugulum, published in 1998, the 23rd book in Sir Terry Pratchett's Discworld series.

The Discworld.  There are few fictional settings I have enjoyed more.  I could probably write a long article on this series, what an influence it's provided to my own writing, and how much I love the Disc and all of the wonderful ways Sir Terry explored Humanity through serious silliness and silly seriousness and sometimes just outright seriousness.  But I see my editor in the corner there making a scissoring gesture, red pen in hand (Along with the consignment to a gulag.[What, is there a word shortage or something, am I being a wrecker by using too many? :-P] Yes), so I will endeavor to stick to details.

I don't think our illustrious host has covered a Pratchett work yet, so in brief (and admittedly with the help of Wikipedia, my editor is now scowling at me[No, it’s cool.]); Terrance David John Pratchett was born on the 28th of April in 1948 in Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire, England, presumably because Beaconsfield did not want its only mark on the world to be the title of a 19th Century Conservative politician.  By his own profession Sir Terry was a "nondescript" student, and became a journalist upon graduation.  He was also already writing short stories while an apprentice journalist. His first book, The Carpet People, would be published in 1971, followed by two SF works, The Dark Side of the Sun and Strata.  In 1983 he published the first Discworld novel, The Colour of Magic (or Color of Magic if one wishes to sparingly use the letter "u" as we Americans try).  He devoted himself to writing after finishing the fourth Discworld novel, Mort, and by the 1990s was writing two books a year, becoming one of the best known humorists and fantasy writers in the world.  In addition to the Discworld he wrote a number of other series and stand-alone books, such as the Johnny Maxwell trilogy in the 1990s and the novel Nation in 2009. He also co-wrote Good Omens with Neil Gaiman in the early 90s, which recently was adapted into a live action mini-series on Amazon Prime.  Discworld has likewise been adapted in numerous ways, with radio dramas, graphic novels, video games, and a few different efforts at television adaptation; two novels were adapted into animated mini-series in the 1990s starring Sir Christopher Lee as the voice of Death, three more live action novel adaptations by Skye in the aughts, and — speaking very loosely — the recent "adaptation" series called "The Watch" on BBC America.  On New Year's 2009 he was knighted for services to literature and a year later won the World Fantasy Award for Life Achievement.  Sadly he passed away on the 12th of March, 2015, after over seven years of combating Alzheimer's, survived by his wife Lyn and his daughter Rhianna.  The world lost a great light on that day, as well as more stories of the Disc, and other worlds, that his imagination and wit would have brought us with time.

Sorry, I've got something in my eye.  Give me a second… okay… no, still in my eye… I'm going to need a bit, okay?

Alright.

Carpe Jugulum, as you can imagine given its numbering in the series, came with the Discworld as an established setting as opposed to some of the odd bits from the early books.  In fact, it's effectively a final chapter, the fifth and final book to focus on the Witches of Lancre (they would make later appearances as supporting characters in a few other Discworld books, particularly the young adult series about Tiffany Aching).  It introduces the Nac Mac Feegle into the Discworld as well (think violent Scottish Smurfs with thick brogues and thicker heads who love fighting, drinking, and stealing "coobeasties" aka cows, a remarkable achievement for six inch high little blue men).  We even get to see a phoenix.  And, of course, as the title suggests… vampires.

But these aren't your usual vampires.  These are vampyres; the re-spelling that Count Magpyr insists upon given his ideas of modernizing the relation between his kind and Humanity, which is to say, formalizing the arrangements by which Humans will let themselves be fed upon by their blood drinking betters in the name of community and harmony (Time to break out the Bolsheviks…).  His wife, the Countess, and children, Vlad and Lacrimosa (often shortened to Lacci), have been invited by King Verence of Lancre to the formal ceremony where his two week old daughter will be officially named, a form of christening among a people who take the naming very seriously.  Just ask the child's mother, semi-retired witch Queen Magrat Garlick, who would have rather someone corrected her mother's spelling of "Margaret" before her naming.

Unfortunately, King Verence's eagerness to be a forward thinking modern monarch has left his kingdom at the mercy of this forward thinking modern vampyre and his followers, since once you invite a vampire in, it can be impossible to get them to leave.  Especially given the whole hypnotize and mentally overpowering humanity part of their skill set (not to mention weather control).  Even worse, many of the other classical methods for taking vampires down don't work on these vampyres, as Count Magpyr has been relentlessly training his family and followers to resist everything from lemon to garlic to swiftly displayed religious iconography (complete with flash cards!).  They're even handling sunlight rather well these days.  So the Witches of Lancre — Granny Weatherwax, Nanny Ogg, Magrat, and Magrat's successor Agnes Nitt and her caustic alternate personality Perdita X Dream — have their work cut out for them in showing these modern thinkers the door, a task that will lead them to the Magpyrs' domains in Uberwald (Sir Terry's take on Eastern Europe), with a little help from the Nac Mac Feegle, newly-arrived Omnian missionary the Quite Reverend Mightily(-Praiseworthy-Are-Ye-Who-Exalteth-Om) Oats, and Igor, the Magpyrs' "more-gothic-than-thou" servant who believes in the traditional ways of things and is fed up with his masters (or "marthterth" as he would put it, the lisp is part of the tradition after all).

I admit that when I re-read books I tend to focus on the bits I enjoyed the most in my first reads.  But fully re-reading Carpe Jugulum reminds me that Sir Terry's style is everywhere in a book, on every page.  His use of footnotes for both humor and worldbuilding, his "no chapters" approach, and the way the quirks of the Discworld and its denizens are explored are tried and true.  Whether he's continuing the humor of almost all the government jobs of the kingdom belonging to one man (Shawn Ogg, one of Nanny's many sons) or following single-minded falconer Hodgesarrgh's hunt for a phoenix, you'll find yourself cracking a smile.  But as always, just because the Discworld is silly and ridiculous doesn't mean it has no dramatic weight, and as always he presents his characters with all their foibles, flaws, and personal touches.  Granny Weatherwax in particular gets some stellar bits, as we get frequent glimpses at how she thinks.  Her arrogance, her struggles with her own dark side, struggling with having to make the decisions demanded of those who live "on the edge" of life, and her frustrations at dealing with an enemy with mental defenses even she cannot break, it sucks you in, and through it all she remains a force in the story.  Agnes' interactions with her split personality Perdita comes off as two sisters who are forced to share the same body despite very different personalities, and she plays a key role through the story after winning the attention of Vlad Magpyr, as she is our viewpoint character for many of the vampyres' arguments and justifications.  Nanny is capable of both direct action and subtlety, a matriarch who understands the power of words and little touches, like showing who has favor in the Ogg family by where their images are placed on her tables.  One of the moments that shocks the others comes when she even proposes that Agnes could, in fact, answer the attention she's getting from Vlad, seduce him, and try and affect his behavior afterward; a revolting idea, but befitting Nanny's character as practical-minded, not bashful at all about matters of sex (indeed she's often come off as a dirty old woman), and understanding of how relationship dynamics can work (sometimes).  Magrat as the retired witch and former maiden of the Lancre Witches balances caring for her newborn child, including some of her and her husband's ideas on baby Esme's development, with her old witch's instincts and continued loyalty to Granny and the others.

Sir Terry even plays with the roles a bit.  The earlier Witch novels of the Disc employed the traditional coven of three, with Granny as the Crone, Nanny Ogg as the Mother, and Magrat as the Maiden.  Now this dynamic is shaken; Magrat is herself a mother, with Agnes/Perdita ready to take her place, but early matters and the idea of Granny leaving Lancre open the idea of all the roles shifting, with Magrat becoming the Mother and Nanny the Crone, a role that Nanny is not particularly interested in.  Indeed, the idea of the three of them having to work together without Granny is part of the middle section of the story.

Mightily Oats gets some good moments as well; he is a young, untried pastor, and he struggles with matters of faith with all sorts of attendant nervousness.  He follows a religion that is described as frequently splitting into more and more congregations due to disagreements, which complicates his faith and underscores his wish for knowledge, arguably certainty, such that he is as much a split personality like Agnes/Perdita in this struggle of faith vs. knowledge.  But he has his own hidden depths, with an insightfulness that Sir Terry employs to give us differing views on his longer-established characters, especially Granny Weatherwax herself.  Oats is a vehicle for Sir Terry to give commentary about religion and sin, including the basis of sin and what religion means to people, and what it could mean.  This does tie into the main plot and the antagonists, of course, given their behavior and outlook.

In comparison to Oats, we also get Igor's sullen insistence on tradition as that kind of playful nod to genre conventions that Sir Terry has so often played with. There's a certain joy in the character, so it's no surprise that in following books Sir Terry didn't so much bring the character back but made him part of an entire extended clan of Igors who specialize in henching (and surgery, medicine, and sanitary practices) and behaving in traditional manners.  He would likewise feature the Nac Mac Feegle prominently in the later Tiffany Aching books (albeit turning down their accents and slang a bit, for the sake of the young adult audience of those books).

Ah, but it's Fangsgiving, so I'll get back to the vampires.  The Magpyrs are an ambitious lot, and with the exception of Countess Magpyr, who mostly just comes off as a stuffy wife and doting mother, they have particular individual tendencies.  Lacrimosa is played off as something of a vampyre goth, hanging out with other vampires who like to adopt strange names like Sally and Fred instead of their perfectly good vampire names like Hieroglyphica.  They wear plain clothes sometimes too!  She also has a teenager's vanity and temper and a cruel, sadistic streak, making her an odd counterpoint to the Perdita personality (and naturally this makes both Agnes and Perdita absolutely detest her).  She does not get along with Vlad, a convert to his father's thinking who is out to persuade Agnes/Perdita to become a vampire willingly, because those little people you're so worried about, well, we'll treat them better than other masters, and their kind always have a master anyway.  Nor are his arguments so easily dismissed, as he makes cutting points about the practicality of the usual arguments about escaping domination and oppression (I have some ideas about that…)[So I am aware.  Your love of guillotines is noted.], albeit still from the perspective of his own selfish interests.  Count Magpyr, of course, is the central figure, a "modern" thinker who believes vampires are at risk of becoming outdated and old if they do not reform.  He, and his family, protest that they are trying to bring the vampire/human relationship into modern times, to move beyond the old monster vs. mortal dichotomy.  They have their own ideas on the best way to do it, which can be described as making their feedings and other displays of superiority a routine, not extraordinary incidents of Humans fighting bloodsucking monsters.  Later in the book we get to see how this works, and I'll just say that it involves lotteries, queues, and "rites of passage" for children of a certain age (Or, you know, we can get rid of the parasites?  In the manner of Buffy the Anarcho-syndicalist Vampire Slayer.  Or maybe they can try not being parasites.)[Read on…].

As an aside, since this is Fangsgiving, Sir Terry would later show more vampires taking a similar attitude of having to reform, though in the direction of co-existence with Humanity requiring forswearing the whole bloodsucking thing (Good!  They can live when the revolution comes.).  We'll get vampires aligned with the actual protagonists, portrayed as essentially being alcoholics pledged to temperance who are constantly surrounding themselves with alcohol, and developing all the little tics you might expect for such people.  With Sir Terry, even the inhuman undead are, in fact, quite Human.

Since my editor's giving a pointed look at the word count, let's bring this to a conclusion.  I know it is customary for Garvin to assign a grade to a book, but I can't bring myself to do so.  True, there are some Discworld books I prefer over others, but they're all equally good in their own way.  They're all stories about stories; how they shape us, how they inform our world and the way we think on it and everything around us.  That includes our stories about vampires and monsters, with Sir Terry having his usual fun with the associated tropes about these mythical bloodsuckers, the purpose of monsters in stories, and through their behavior, ideas of what good and evil and sin really are.  And like with every other Discworld book, Carpe Jugulum has the usual observations and fun about the foibles of life and Humanity.  It is a treasure that gives us a fond farewell to the Witches of Lancre and I greatly enjoyed reading it once again.


Have a Happy Halloween, everyone!


Red text as always is our editor Dr Ben Allen

Black text is our valient guest reviewer Gary Stevens, independent author, friend of the review and one of our ever wise patrons.

Friday, October 15, 2021

Buffy the Vampire Slayer The Origin By Josh Whedon and Dan Brereton

 Buffy the Vampire Slayer The Origin 

By Josh Whedon and Dan Brereton


This comic is often considered volume 0 and is adapted straight from Whedon's original script of the film. It was released as a 5 issue mini-series that ran from January 1999 to March 1999 printed by Dark Horse comics. Now Mr. Brerton wrote the comic itself, he's an American-born artist and writer known mostly for his work in comics. His best-known works are the comics Nocturnals and Giantkiller. Before I get into the comic itself though, we got into Joss Whedon. 


Whedon was born on June 23, 1964, in New York City. The middle born of 5 kids, all boys and a 3rd generation television writer. Whedon's father wrote for the Golden Girls and his grandfather was a writer on the Dick Van Dyke show. Whedon attended Winchester College in England and graduated from Wesleyan University in 1987. He worked as a staff writer on Roseanne and Parenthood and was an uncredited writer on films like Speed, Waterworld, and Twister. He also co-wrote Toy Story, an early draft of Atlantis the Lost Empire, Titan AE, and Alien Resurrection, although he has publicly stated dissatisfaction with Alien Resurrection and Titan AE (I however am insane, and actually kinda like Alien Resurrection.  Mostly because Brad Dourif is my creeper-patronus, Winona Rider is always great, and I picked Signourney Weaver as my Mandatory Gay-Man’s Pop-Icon.  Kill me #RipleyClones.)


His big break was when he convinced enough people to give Buffy Summers a second chance and produce a television show that became, well, huge. He then produced the spin-off Angel and went on to write or direct a large part of modern nerd pop culture. Television shows like Firefly and the film Serenity, a 24 issue run on The Astonishing X Men, Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog. The films Cabin in the Woods, Avengers, Avengers Age of Ultron. Joss Whedon was rapidly becoming... The King Nerd on Nerd Mountain if you'll excuse my bluntness but here's where we got to grab the bull by the horns. 


Because things started to surface, there was a letter from his ex-wife accusing him of infidelity and predatory behavior throughout their marriage. This simmered for a few years until in 2020 Ray Fisher accused Whedon of unprofessional behavior on the set of Justice League. Fisher was supported by his co-star Jason Momoa and Gal Godot came forward stating that her own experience with Whedon was less than pleasant in her own words, she later expanded on them saying Whedon would threaten her career whenever she disagreed with him. Then Charisma Carpenter, came forward with her experience on the Buffy and Angel set basically calling out Whedon for being abusive, bullying, and basically acting like the villains he wrote for the show. Amber Benson and Michelle Trachtenberg also backed up Ms. Carpenter as did basically the rest of the Buffy cast including Sarah Michelle Geller. Even other writers, like Jose Molina, called Whedon casually cruel and spoke about how Whedon enjoyed making women writers cry while working on Firefly. Detailing how Whedon once bragged about making one young lady cry twice in a single session. Which is not something a grown man should ever brag about! I mean making your employees cry once isn't a good thing never mind twice! (Frigid covered it pretty good.  I just want to say that bosses like this are one reason why people like me exist.)


So as of this writing, the King Nerd has fallen (Unfortunately, he didn’t get Romanoved. {If we start killing people in basements for being petty bullies, we’re going to run out of basements}), and it's nobody’s fault but his own. Because the guy who wrote Giles, Buffy Summers, Malcolm Reynolds, and Agent Colson, sure as hell knew better. He sure as hell was capable of better and decided to act like a petty cruel little bully anyway. So what does that mean for the body of work he leaves behind? For me, it doesn't change much. The works are still what they are and at this point refusing to partake isn't going to help anyone. Instead, maybe we should look at these works and use them as opportunities to realize that any of us can rise above ourselves and any of us can sink to dark depths. Let's turn to fiction, shall we? 


Buffy is a vampire hunter who outshines the vampires she is hunting.  It’s characters like her who bring the Vampire Hunter, an archetype that was present as far back as Carmilla but overshadowed by the monster they hunt, into the limelight.  Maybe it’s because in this case, the little blonde girl who we expect to be the victim is the one doing the hunting.  Maybe it’s because Buffy plays into the idea of Vampires as hidden predators and abusers and how they can be confronted (In a lot of ways, she is largely hunting toxic-masculine archetypes.  Or really just toxic human archetypes.  It’s great.). Or maybe it’s because Buffy is a Vampire Hunter whose entire life isn’t defined by the monsters she hunts. So Buffy is allowed to be a person with family, friends, and goals outside of killing the monster, whatever or whoever that monster may be.  The Origin is a look at how Buffy gets dragged kicking and screaming into her role as Slayer and a frank look at what crossing the threshold from normal life to heroism costs her. 


The Origin starts out much the same as the film but quickly gets darker in tone. The vampires are more menacing and savage with the characters being completely redesigned. Lothos especially is unrecognizable compared to his film counterpart and that's a good thing. You also have the battle between Slayer and Vampires take on a more cat and mouse tone. It feels like Merrick and Buffy are fighting a guerrilla war, ambushing vampires at their most vulnerable and trying to stay away from the stronger ones that Buffy can't fight yet. Mostly by actively fleeing whenever Lothos shows up. This creates a whole different tone to the business of being a Slayer. No longer I am wondering if Merrick is really in the business of setting up young women to be meals on wheels for a middle-aged, self-important predator. Instead, Merrick comes across as a desperate man who is outnumbered, outgunned, and just trying to get one Slayer across the finish line come what may. 


Pike also comes across as more harried in the comic, while in the movie his friend Benny whinging at the window to be let in so he can eat is played more for laughs. Here it's made to feel like Pike is put under siege every night and he sees his only options as escaping town entirely or helping Buffy kill his tormentors so he can at least get a good night's sleep. Which actually helps build a believable relationship between the two (I mean...yeah.  Helping kill vampires so you can actually nap is pretty reasonable.). Pike is at least roughly in Buffy's age group being under 21 and is the only one she can talk to as an equal about this insanity. Meanwhile, she is Pike's best chance of ending this nightmare and returning to a normalish life. As normal as you can live knowing vampires are a real thing and roam our cities anyways (Yeah, I would not be living normal after that.)


Not much is changed about Buffy's friends, although their upper-class lifestyles are brought more front and center so that there's a greater removal between them and most of the victims (The vampire’s victims, or theirs? {They’re not really shown as having victims unless we count them bullying each other}). While they at least express fear and some wonderment at what the hell is going on around them, they still come across as callous and superficial but at least it's a bit more realistic (Rich teenagers being callous and superficial is hyper-realism.). Things really take a turn for the dark when instead of being killed by Lothos, Merrick actively kills himself with a pistol rather than be turned into a vampire and used as an intelligence source by Lothos (Based As Fuck.). Buffy has a near breakdown over losing the one adult in her life that had been a mentor figure to her and attempts to totally retreat back into her old life patterns, and this is shown and treated as the mental break it is. The finale only gets darker as the body count is rammed up, Buffy's friends betray her to the vampires and it ends with her burning down the school gym to kill all the vampires and fleeing to Los Vegas with Pike. 


I honestly like this version a lot better. It works better with the television show and while avoiding unnecessary gore or shock is still horrific and dark. We have Buffy's nightmarish situation of being thrown into a war completely cold, paired with Pike's situation of being besieged by a monster wearing his best friend's face. All of this juxtaposed with the banality of American high school and the superficial, self-absorption of your average (bourgeois {having run into teenagers from communist nations, there’s not much difference}) teenager.  Buffy and Pike are able to put an end to the abuse and predation they’re suffering from but because of the indifference of society around them, that end comes at a high price. 


This speaks to a lot of different real-life situations that people find themselves in and also just feels more grounded without the constant attempt to lighten the tone with hit or miss comedy. The Origin gets a B+ from me. I encourage you to give it a read, it's available as a graphic novel, part of the Dark Horse series omnibus or you can find scans of it online although I'm sure no one reading this review would ever google the title of this miniseries and add the phrase read online or some such. 


I hope you enjoyed this doubleheader review folks. Join us tomorrow for a guest review looking at vampires via Terry Pratchett. Next week, I look at how we fuse the vampire with the vampire hunter and get the qualities of both. We look at Vampire Hunter D and Blade! Now Fangsgiving is brought to you by our ever-wise Patrons. They voted to have this theme month and have it focused on vampires. You can join us at https://www.patreon.com/frigidreads for as little as a dollar a month. See you soon and until then, stay safe and Keep Reading.



Buffy the Vampire Slayer film Directed by Fran Rubel Kuzui

 Buffy the Vampire Slayer film 

 Directed by Fran Rubel Kuzui


So what if there was a movie that had Luke Perry, Seth Green, Ben Affleck, Hillary Swank, Paul Rubens, and Donald Sutherland all together with dialogue written by Joss Whedon? (I mean, knowing what we know now about Joss?  Or not? {I’ll get to him in his own time, wait for it}) What if I told you this movie was produced by a company owned by Dolly Parton? (She is precious, and gets to live when the revolution comes.{I will note that the editors opinions are the not opinion of the review series}) Welcome to Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Filmed in 5 weeks with a budget of 7 million dollars, you wouldn't think this film was the advance warning of a 7 season pop culture juggernaut that would launch multiple careers and create a multimedia franchise that would affect our views on vampires, werewolves, various other monsters and those who hunt them? Yet, here we are over 20 years later and I know people who aren't nerds who make Buffy Summers jokes. A quick google search shows articles being written about the show in 2021 when the show ended in 2003. Hell, there are still people writing fanfiction of this show! So let's dive in. 


Fran Rubel Kuzui is an American-born film director and producer. She received her master's degree at New York University and worked as a script supervisor for a decade before her first film. That film was 1988's Tokyo Pop which she not only directed but co-wrote. It was released in the Cannes Film Festival to critical acclaim. It was there that she discovered the script to Buffy the Vampire Slayer written by the then little-known Joss Whedon (don't worry we'll get to him). She helped expand the character of Buffy and with her husband Kaz Kuzui, pulled together the deal to produce the film. She would later be a producer for the television show and its spin-off Angel. 


The making of the film was rocky, Mr. Whedon walked off the set upset at the changes they made to the story and the tone. As well as the fact that they basically let Donald Sutherland rewrite his dialogue on a whim (And it was glorious.). I think part of that might be the 5-week filming limit, imposed by the need to get Luke Perry back to his show Beverly Hills 90210 (So THAT’S where he got famous. Always wondered here he came from.  Kinda thought he was a thirst trap in this movie when I was younger…). I mean when you’ve got 5 weeks and your biggest star and veteran performer decides his lines are better, there's a lot of pressure to just let him have his way and get to the next scene I think. Originally written to be a fairly dark and fairly disturbing comedy (we'll go more into the changes in the next review folks) the studio pushed for a lighter tone and the removal of the more objectionable and darker events of the storyline. To the point that Mr. Whedon has announced the film non-canon to the main Buffy universe (Which, given he created it is, is his right. Even if he is scum. {I bloody well said wait for it!} That doesn’t mean we can’t make our own folks.  Death of the author and all that.)


The film is about Buffy, a cheerleader and utterly neglected only child of a wealthy family (Funny thing, after a certain point, wealth actually starts to decrease life expectancy and happiness.  The sweet spot is about 80-100k per year, adjusted for the cost of living.  Funnily enough, this is about what tenured scientists make.  We study our own graphs, you see.  I make about half that though, because of civil service.). At the start of the film, Buffy is a very superficial and frankly air-headed high school senior whose biggest concern is making sure the senior dance goes well and staying in the good graces of her equally superficial friends. She is forced to grow up and realize that there's more going on in the world around her when she gets pulled into a war. Because she's been born as the Slayer, a girl with superpowers meant to hunt down and kill vampires and various creatures of the night. She's informed of all this by Merrick, a watcher, a person whose duty it is to track down Slayers, train them, and set them loose on said monsters. 


That said, the Slayers in the film aren't very impressive. They seem to be a long line of chosen girls who kill a number of newbie vampires and then get killed by the head vampire, Lothos, played by Rutger Hauer and his right hand Amilyn. A bit of a fun fact, Amilyn was originally written to be played by a woman but the actress was unable to take part so they hired... Paul Reubens, who's mainly known for playing Pee-Wee Herman (I didn’t even recognize him.  Good makeup work.). Now, I'm usually against type casing and I honestly believe we should let actors try different roles and things instead of straight jacketing them but Reubens is about as threatening as a bowl of lukewarm oatmeal here. He just isn't ‘creature of the night material (He was good comic-relief though. {He’s supposed to be the hatchetman of the main villain! We’re supposed to view him as a threat not as a giggle!})


 Honestly, Hauer isn't much better as his main role seems to be to walk into the scene, look at the slayer, tell them to come over here, and bite them without the ladies in question offering much resistance. Often flouncing about in clothes that make him look like a renfaire cosplayer having a mid-life crisis (Don’t judge them.{The cosplayers?  No judgment but I demand my vampires look more threatening than that!}). Which makes you wonder how the Slayers got their reputation in the first place and honestly leaves me questioning if the Watchers are actually training vampire slayers or if they're just feeding athletic girls to Lothos to keep him distracted (Maybe it’s a “Lothos gets to them before they get good” kinda thing. {for over 7 generations}). That said Reubens and Hauer do have some fun scenes together. 


The lack of menace, however, undercuts the film, even as characters are killed. Part of the problem is how indifferent everyone besides Buffy and Pike (Luke Perry's character) are to people they know turning up brutally murdered. I know this is meant to underscore how callous and superficial the characters are but combined with the comedic tone of the movie, the overall feeling is... Eh? Beyond that the acting is alright but I feel bad decisions were made in the casting beyond just non-threatening vampires. There's a lack of chemistry between Luke Perry and Kristy Swanson for example. This is maybe why the character of Pike just completely disappears from the story in the television show. Overall the movie isn't bad, I laughed at most of the jokes (although Reuben's death scene went on too long to be funny) and the dialogue isn't bad. The action is mostly okay but nothing special.


All that said, there is a good idea at the core of this movie, and Buffy even in the film is more interesting than the monsters she's killing. This is rare for a vampire hunter, I mean even Van Helsing, who is a very interesting character, takes a back seat to Dracula. I suppose to be fair, who doesn't take a backseat to motherfucking Dracula himself? Buffy, however, is mainly fighting off amped-up undead teenagers and vampires in the shape of middle-aged men, which isn't that deeply buried a metaphor. That said as a movie, I gotta give Buffy the Vampire Slayer a C-. As an adaptation, it scores much the same, as Whedon would later release his original script in a comic book form. Which we are gonna look at right now. 


Saturday, October 9, 2021

The Dead Travel Fast: Stalking Vampires from Nosferatu to Count Chocula By Eric Nuzum

  The Dead Travel Fast: Stalking Vampires from Nosferatu to Count Chocula

By Eric Nuzum 


Eric Nuzum is an American writer, podcaster, producer, and critic. He was born in Canton Ohio in 1966. He attended Kent State University from 1985 to 1988 and graduated with a Bachelor’s in the Arts. From 1998 to 2004 he went to work for WKSU, a non-commercial, educational radio station licensed in Kent that can be heard in Northeastern Ohio. From WKSU he moved to NPR and in 10 years rose to Vice President of programming before moving over to Audible in 2015 and leaving in 2018 to found his own podcast company, Magnificent Noise. During all of this, he earned the Edward R Murrow award for News writing (awarded to him in 2002). He also married a lady named Katherine and moved to D.C. Most importantly for us though he wrote 4 books, it's his second book that we're reviewing today. 


The Dead Travel Fast is a pop culture look at vampires. From various movies, books, playing one in a haunted house, or trying to track down and talk to people who claim to be vampires (Both fetishists and a certain Nicholas Cage film?  Or are we talking Fully Deluded here? {Yes}). Mr. Nuzum attempts a broad overview of the space that vampires occupy in American culture, what we get out of vampires, and why. Mr. Nuzum attempts in this book to try and dig out just why Vampires have taken such a deep root in our culture and look at the different cultural expressions of it. To do that he goes on trips across the country, taking vampire tours of San Francisco, attending a Dark Shadows convention (Dear God. I remember watching that as a child.  There are conventions for that? {Not many but yeah}), and interviewing people in New York. He also heads out to the United Kingdom and Romania taking various Dracula-related tours to try and dig out some information there because let's face it, you can't talk Vampires without talking Dracula. He also meets various people claiming to be vampires in chain restaurants and bars (Pre-arranged?  Or did he just run into them? {pre-arranged}). Plays a vampire in two haunted houses, drinks his own blood (Well alright then!), and attempts a ritual to become a vampire because... You know, I'm going to be honest, I have no idea why he did that other than to fill space in his book (I’m gonna give him points for taking his subject seriously.  Now I’m curious about the ritual itself to be honest?  What magical tradition are we talking here?  Unsystematized folk-magick, or are we talking something derived from Crowleyan Hermeticism? {AHAHAHAAHA, You think he went into that much effort?  It was a random list of ingredients and instructions from the internet}). Don't drink blood, not even your own readers, other people's blood is of questionable safety at best (That’s how you get the HIV!  Seriously, I don’t normally kink-shame, but the “Vampires” have like, the least-safe fetish ever.  Like, if you’re gonna do that shit, at least get on PrEP first.  This has been a PSA from a former University Dorm Sex Ed Sherpa!), and drinking your own blood is just silly and kind of gross (Eh, we’ve all done it. {I don’t recall guzzling down a shot glass’ worth of my own blood at any point in my life.  Granted I’m missing a few days here and there but pretty sure I would remember that})


The book is written in the first person and frankly, it's as much about Mr. Nuzum's quest to experience vampiredom directly or indirectly as it is any real study of what vampires are or what they meant to other people (It would kinda have to be.  No way something like this is dry and academic.). Very informal and breezy, the book is easy to read and is rather engaging. Mr. Nuzum knows how to entertain readers and keeps his narrative moving at a relaxed but brisk pace that I think other writers could learn from. You quickly come to empathize with him and respect his suffering for his quest (Tell us about the suffering…). Whether it be his exhaustion in playing a vampire in a haunted house (something I'm still questioning why on earth was even necessary[Because it’s fun.  Seriously, there was no actual point to this.  This is a passion project done for its own sake.]) or the battling of the infection of his thumb on the Romanian Vampire tour from hell (Oh Dear). Since he still has the thumb, be sure to ask him if he's sure a mosquito bit it, he still loves it when people make that joke. While I question why some of this was necessary, I will say I respect his willingness to do it and his willingness to admit how silly he made himself look in public for the sake of this book. Say what you will, that's a man devoted to giving you a good story and something to chuckle over, and we should treasure that. 


His collection of anecdotes from his quest are peppered with various vampire facts and historical data, although I openly question if he actually read the Vampyre by Dr. John Polodori. I can't fault him for backing away from Varney the Vampire, because I have the complete series on Kindle and it's almost 800 pages (I can.  We’ve all read 800 pages of madness before). I do believe that he did watch over 300 vampire films, although again I find myself questioning... Why? (Obsession Frigid.  Seriously.  He got a bug up his ass and became obsessed.  I got obsessed and am writing Psi Corps War and Peace, and am re-writing Harry Potter as communist propaganda.{Yes but you’re insane and prone to obsession, you’d have to be just to get your Ph.D.}) Something I wrestled with repeatedly over the course of this book, is why and what does this action have to do with learning any of the answers to the questions he asks. Maybe it's the anthropology training in me but I found his methods rather sloppy and haphazard (Oh, they were.  He basically took a year or whatever to completely dork out on something with no real rhyme or reason.  Clearly.). I also found the book in dire need of reorganization. Because much like Mr. Nuzum, it seems to meander all over the place, at times wandering into places that are barely connected to vampirism. Mr. Nuzum seems content to have the book be a collection of stories he did while researching vampires without tying it together into any real narrative or engaging any real themes or vampiric archetypes. So this comes across as less of a study of vampires per se and more of a broad survey of how the idea of vampires are treated and used. 


Not surprisingly, given that we live in a capitalist culture (we will now pause to give the editor a moment to wail in anguish [I’ll just be over here, wailing in anguish and trying to forge all the leftist organizations in CITY REDACTED into Marxist-Leninist Voltron.]) one position that Mr. Nuzum seems to examine a lot is vampires as a cash cow. Our modern culture is awash with vampire merchandise, from vampire-themed tours, hotels, and events, to vampire fashion and knick-knacks and Mr. Nuzum dives right in. He's even willing to try out Dracula novelty candy. I feel this is a missed opportunity in the book because there's something incredibly symbolic about the vampire of all monsters being milked for a profit but he really never discusses that, preferring to discuss various experiences he's having instead


My favorite example has to be his tour of Highgate Cemetery in London (Where Marx is buried. Has a big bust there.). You see, the cemetery Lucy was buried at in Dracula, Kingstead, doesn't exist. However, a lot of writers think that Bram may have based it off of Highgate Cemetery. I should note this is contested because what isn't contested in Dracula lore? Mr. Nuzum does a great job giving the history of the cemetery explaining not just its links to Dracula lore but to general vampirism, such as there being a brief vampire scare there in the late 1960s and early 1970s (So many drugs…). It basically started with people claiming to see ghosts in the cemetery at night, then claims of mutilated bodies and witchcraft. Next thing you know newspapers (What you have to remember is that a lot of British newspapers are worth less than the paper they are printed on.) are talking about claims of a vampire operating out of the cemetery. This led to a pair of occultists raiding the cemetery with one claiming to have been arrested for slamming stakes into corpses. This was 50 years ago! In England! A western, developed country where the population is supposed to have a basic education in science and biology. Today Highgate is a combination of the national landmark and nature preserve, as much of it has been overgrown and is slowly rewilding itself. The London government encourages this by keeping people out of the cemetery except for carefully guided tours. Because despite the small size, you can get lost in there. 


If Highgate is my favorite part of the book, my least favorite is anytime Mr. Nuzum deals with people who claim to be vampires or attempt to become one. This honestly comes across less as an investigation or research effort and more as an attempt to interject something sensational into the book (Alternative suggestion: when you deep-dive into vampires for long enough, you run into these people.  And it’s like watching a train derail, you can’t pull your eyes away.). To be honest, if it is an attempt at interjecting sensationalism into the book, it's an utter failure of one. I suppose the revelation that most of the people reaching out to claim the mantle of vampires are just as mundane and boring as the rest of us is comforting on a certain level. Also, I don't see what these subcultures really have to do with the subject of the book. If the book is about the cultural effect of the vampire then you should certainly touch on their existence but given how little cultural impact these groups have and how little they affect the cultural image of the vampire itself, I feel that Mr. Nuzum wasted time in Applebees and bars, he could have spent actually studying (I don’t know.  I feel like such people are so strange that there’s a certain draw to them.  The pull of the absurd, if you will.  And I say that as someone whose early Disney exposure turned him into a degenerate furry.)


That said, while a subculture is always interesting to look at, you can't really get anything done with a group like people who believe they're vampires unless you're willing to spend years building relationships. Studying groups of people, especially those who know they'll be mocked or worse if they reveal too much is a work of trust and care. It takes years.  So this part made my anthropologist self firmly stick his nose up in the air and declare, no, no you're doing this all wrong and if you're not willing to do this right why are you even bothering? Of course, we should keep in mind that Mr. Nuzum is not an anthropologist, but a man who is chasing a passion basically. Just keep that in mind if you're looking to approach a group as an outsider who wants to study said group, this isn't how you do it. 


  If I had to boil it down, I would say this book is fun and pleasant to read but not especially informative or revealing. Part of my antipathy I admit, is that maybe I'm generally not a fan of books that announce themselves to be a study of a subject and keep focusing on their authors instead. I had too many books like that in college. That said, Mr. Nuzum is a fun guy to read about and he takes pains to show us interesting and amusing things. Plus given that the book is under 250 pages, it's a fairly quick read. I blazed through it in a single sitting and at least I had some fun reading it. If you're looking for some serious vampire information, however, you're not gonna find a lot. This is broad but shallow, and honestly as much about a single man's desire to know what being a vampire feels like as it is about vampires; the monster or cultural icon. The Dead Travel Fast: Stalking Vampires from Nosferatu to Count Chocula by Eric Nuzum gets a C from me. If you're into vampires there are simply better places to go but if you read this book you'll at least be entertained. 


    Next week, I'm gonna look at something a bit to the side, next week we look at Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Until then, stay safe and Keep Reading.